Defense of Marriage Act

Defense of Marriage Act
Tajuk panjang	An Act to define and protect the institution of marriage
Akronim	DOMA
Telah digubal oleh	104th United States Congress
Berkesan	21 September 1996; 28 tahun yang lalu
Petikan
	Pub.L. 104–199
Stat.	110 Stat. 2419 (1996)
Kodifikasi
Tajuk dipinda	1 U.S.C. General Provisions; 28 U.S.C. Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Seksyen-seksyen U.S.C. yang dicipta	1 U.S.C. § 7 (Struck down, June 26, 2013)
Legislative history
	Diperkenalkan di House sebagai H.R. 3396 oleh Bob Barr (R–GA) pada May 7, 1996; Pertimbangan persidangan oleh: Committee on the Judiciary (Subcommittee on the Constitution); Meluluskan House pada July 12, 1996 (Yeas: 342; Nays: 67); Meluluskan Senate onpada September 10, 1996 (Yeas: 85; Nays: 14) ; Ditandatangani menjadi undang-undang oleh Presiden Bill Clinton pada September 21, 1996;
Pindaan-pindaan utama
Kes-kes Mahkamah Agung
	United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. ___ (2013), (Docket No. 12-307), in which Section 3 (1 U.S.C. § 7) was struck down by the Supreme Court on June 26, 2013
	l; b; s;

The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) ialah undang-undang persekutuan Amerika Syarikat yang diluluskan oleh Kongres Amerika Syarikat ke-104 dan ditandatangani oleh Presiden Bill Clinton. Ia menetapkan perkahwinan untuk tujuan persekutuan sebagai penyatuan seorang lelaki dan seorang wanita, dan membenarkan negeri-negeri untuk menolak untuk mengiktiraf perkahwinan sesama jenis yang diberikan berdasarkan undang-undang negeri lain. Peruntukan akta tersebut diputuskan tidak berperlembagaan atau dibiarkan tidak dapat dilaksanakan oleh keputusan Mahkamah Agung dalam kes United States v. Windsor (2013) dan Obergefell v. Hodges (2015).^[1]^[2]

Rujukan

^ Supreme Court of the United States (June 26, 2015). "United States v. Windsor" (PDF). supremecourt.gov.
^ Schott, Webster (November 12, 1967). "Civil Rights and the Homosexual: A 4-Million Minority Asks for Equal Rights" (PDF). The New York Times. Dicapai pada March 28, 2012.

Bibliografi

Feigen, Brenda. "Same-Sex Marriage: An Issue of Constitutional rights not Moral Opinions." 2004. 27 Harv. Women's L. J. 345.
"Litigating the Defense of Marriage Act: The Next Battleground for Same-Sex Marriage." 2004. 117 Harv. L. Rev. 2684.
Manning, Jason (April 30, 2004). "Backgrounder: The Defense of Marriage Act". The Online News Hour. The News Hour with Jim Lehrer. Dicapai pada January 13, 2007.
"Same Sex Marriage Passage" CQ Weekly. Congressional Quarterly. May 2, 2005.
United States. 104th Congress. Defense of Marriage Act. House of Representatives Committee Report. 1996.
Wardle, Lynn D. "A Critical Analysis of Constitutional Claims for Same Sex Marriage." 1996. 1996 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 1.
Carter, W. Burlette. "The Federal Law of Marriage: Deference, Deviation and DOMA." 2013. 21 Am. U. J. Gender, Soc. Pol'y & L 70; http://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/faculty_publications/701/

[Opinion-1] Supreme Court of the United States (June 26, 2015). "United States v. Windsor" (PDF). supremecourt.gov.

[2] Schott, Webster (November 12, 1967). "Civil Rights and the Homosexual: A 4-Million Minority Asks for Equal Rights" (PDF). The New York Times. Dicapai pada March 28, 2012.

[1]

[2]